4.3 Article

Derivation of male germ cells from ram bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells by three different methods and evaluation of their fate after transplantation into the testis

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11626-015-9945-4

Keywords

Ram; Mesenchymal stem cells; In vitro; Germ cells; Fate; Transplantation; Testis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have the capacity to differentiate into germ cells (GCs). This research, for the first time, has evaluated the fate of in vitro MSC-derived GCs generated by three different induction methods and compared them after transplantation into the testes of rams. Passage-3 ram bone marrow (BM)-MSCs were divided into three treatment groups: (1) 14-d treatment with 10 mu M retinoic acid (RA; RA14), (2) 21-d treatment with 10 mu M RA (RA21), and (3) 21-d treatment with 10 ng/ml transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGFb1). After confirmation of the existence of germ-like cells in the culture, the treated cells were labeled and transplanted into the testes of ram lambs. After 2 mo, we conducted histological evaluations of the rams' testes. Results showed that in vitro-derived GCs from all treatment groups survived in the testes. Some of these GCs homed at the basement membrane of seminiferous tubules and formed colonies. The homed cells and cell colonies were similar to testicular native spermatogonia and expressed PGP9.5. TGFb1 exhibited the highest efficiency for in vitro production of GCs as well as the highest capability for homing and colony formation in the testes. RA21 was less efficient than TGFb1, particularly in colony formation. RA14 was the weakest group. No further differentiation of the transplanted GCs was observed. From our results, it could be concluded that a 21-d treatment period of BM-MSCs with TGFb1 is the most efficient method for in vitro generation of spermatogonia-like cells that survive, home, and form colonies in the testes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available