4.0 Article

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF COMPOSITION AND TECHNOLOGICAL QUALITY OF AMARANTH I. GROSS CHEMICAL COMPOSITION, AMINO ACID AND MINERAL CONTENT

Journal

ACTA ALIMENTARIA
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages 341-347

Publisher

AKADEMIAI KIADO RT
DOI: 10.1556/AAlim.38.2009.3.8

Keywords

amaranth grain; chemical composition; amino acid profile of proteins; effect of heat treatment

Funding

  1. Hungarian Scientific Research Found [T-T-032650]
  2. Hungarian-Austrian Intergovernmental S& T Cooperation Programme [A-20/03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Eight groups of amaranth grain samples, belonging to the species Amaranthus cruentus and A. hypochondriacus, grown in Austria and Hungary were studied. Gross chemical composition, amino acid content and mineral composition of the whole grain were determined. The effect of heat treatment on amino acid content was also investigated. The range of concentration of main constituents of samples studied corresponded to the average data reported by other researchers. However, the relatively big difference between lowest (14.23%) and highest (17.40%) protein content suggests that genetic potential for increasing the protein content may be realized in breeding. Amino acid composition profile is generally closer to Leguminosae than to cereal grains except for sulphur containing amino acids being present in higher amount in amaranth than in legumes. The concentrations of minerals in seeds varied in a relatively wide range, and the micro-components, like Fe, Cu, Zn, were present in higher amount in amaranth seeds compared to the average values found in wheat. It was confirmed that heat treatment of amaranth grain (e. g. popping) might reduce the available lysine content. Contradictory data published in the literature may be explained by differences in initial sugar and moisture content of grain, which influence the rate of potential Maillard-reaction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available