4.8 Article

Vertically Aligned N-Doped Coral-like Carbon Fiber Arrays as Efficient Air Electrodes for High-Performance Nonaqueous Li-O2 Batteries

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages 3015-3022

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn500327p

Keywords

Li-air battery; oxygen electrode; carbon fiber; catalyst; electrochemistry

Funding

  1. AFOSR [FA9550-12-1-0069, FA9550-12-1-0037]
  2. DOD-Army [W911NF-11-1-0209]
  3. NSF-AIR [IIP-1343270]
  4. NSF [CMMI-1266295]
  5. DAGSI
  6. NSFC-NSF MWN [NSF-DMR 1106160]
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  8. Division Of Materials Research [1106160] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Directorate For Engineering
  10. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1266319, 1266295] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  11. Directorate For Engineering
  12. Div Of Industrial Innovation & Partnersh [1343270] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High energy efficiency and long cycleability are two important performance measures for Li-air batteries. Using a rationally designed oxygen electrode based on a vertically aligned nitrogen-doped coral-like carbon nanofiber (VA-NCCF) array supported by stainless steel cloth, we have developed a nonaqueous Li-O-2 battery with an energy efficiency as high as 90% and a narrow voltage gap of 0.3 V between discharge/charge plateaus. Excellent reversibility and cycleability were also demonstrated for the newly developed oxygen electrode. The observed outstanding performance can be attributed to its unique vertically aligned, coral-like N-doped carbon microstructure with a high catalytic activity and an optimized oxygen/electron transportation capability, coupled with the microporous stainless steel substrate. These results demonstrate that highly efficient and reversible Li-O-2 batteries are feasible by using a rationally designed carbon-based oxygen electrode.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available