4.8 Article

Chemically Bonded TiO2-Bronze Nanosheet/Reduced Graphene Oxide Hybrid for High-Power Lithium Ion Batteries

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 1491-1499

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn405534r

Keywords

lithium ion batteries; nanosheets; reduced graphene oxide; titanium dioxide; anode

Funding

  1. University of Michigan Energy Institute
  2. National Science Foundation [DMR-1253347]
  3. NSF [DMR-0320710, DMR-0315633]
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1253347] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Materials Research [1253347] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although Li-ion batteries have attracted significant interest due to their higher energy density, lack of high rate performance electrode materials and intrinsic safety issues challenge their commercial applications. Herein, we demonstrate a simple photocatalytic reduction method that simultaneously reduces graphene oxide (GO) and anchors (010)-faceted mesoporous bronze-phase titania (TiO2-B) nanosheets to reduced graphene oxide (RGO) through Ti3+-C bonds. Formation of Ti3+-C bonds during the photocatalytic reduction process was identified using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) techniques. When cycled between 1-3 V (vs Li+/0), these chemically bonded TiO2-B/RGO hybrid nanostructures show significantly higher Li-ion storage capacities and rate capability compared to bare TiO2-B nanosheets and a physically mixed TiO2-B/RGO composite. In addition, 80% of the initial specific (gravimetric) capacity was retained even after 1000 charge-discharge cycles at a high rate of 40C The improved electrochemical performance of TiO2-B/RGO nanoarchitectures is attributed to the presence of exposed (010) facets, mesoporosity, and efficient interfacial charge transfer between RGO monolayers and TiO2-B nanosheets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available