4.8 Article

DNA Base Detection Using a Single-Layer MoS2

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages 7914-7922

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn5029295

Keywords

DNA; sequencing; nanopore; MoS2; electronic detection; MD; DFT

Funding

  1. AFOSR [FA9550-12-1-0464]
  2. NSF [1127480, 1264282]
  3. National Science Foundation [OCI-1053575]
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1264282] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys
  7. Directorate For Engineering [1127480] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanopore-based DNA sequencing has led to fast and high-resolution recognition and detection of DNA bases. Solid-state and biological nanopores have low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) (< 10) and are generally too thick (> 5 nm) to be able to read at single-base resolution. A nanopore in graphene, a 2-D material with sub-nanometer thickness, has a SNR of similar to 3 under DNA ionic current In this report, using atomistic and quantum simulations, we find that a single layer MoS2 is an extraordinary material (with a SNR > 15) for DNA sequencing by two competing technologies (i.e., nanopore and nanochannel). A MoS2 nanopore shows four distinct ionic current signals for single-nucleobase detection with low noise. In addition, a single-layer MoS2 shows a characteristic change/response in the total density of states for each base. The band gap of MoS2 is significantly changed compared to other nanomaterials (e.g., graphene, h-BN, and silicon nanowire) when bases are placed on top of the pristine MoS2 and armchair MoS2 nanoribbon, thus making MoS2 a promising material for base detection via transverse current tunneling measurement MoS2 nanopore benefits from a craftable pore architecture (combination of Mo and S atoms at the edge) which can be engineered to obtain the optimum sequencing signals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available