4.8 Article

Shape-Controlled Synthesis of Hybrid Nanomaterials via Three-Dimensional Hydrodynamic Focusing

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 8, Issue 10, Pages 10026-10034

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn502549v

Keywords

shape-controlled synthesis; 3D hydrodynamic focusing; organic; metal hybrid materials

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [1DP2OD007209-01, HL109442, EB015300, AI096305]
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. Penn State Center for Nanoscale Science (MRSEC) [DMR-0820404]
  4. Danish Research Council [11-116325/FTP]
  5. Lundbeck Foundation in Denmark [R95-A10275]
  6. Whitaker International Program
  7. U.S. Fulbright Program
  8. NSF

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Shape-controlled synthesis of nanomaterials through a simple, continuous, and low-cost method is essential to nanomaterials research toward practical applications. Hydrodynamic focusing, with its advantages of simplicity, low-cost, and precise control over reaction conditions, has been used for nanomaterial synthesis. While most studies have focused on improving the uniformity and size control, few have addressed the potential of tuning the shape of the synthesized nanomaterials. Here we demonstrate a facile method to synthesize hybrid materials by three-dimensional hydrodynamic focusing (3D-HF). While keeping the flow rates of the reagents constant and changing only the flow rate of the buffer solution, the molar ratio of two reactants (i.e., tetrathiafulvalene (TTF) and HAuCl4) within the reaction zone varies. The synthesized TTF-Au hybrid materials possess very different and predictable morphologies. The reaction conditions at different buffer flow rates are studied through computational simulation, and the formation mechanisms of different structures are discussed. This simple one-step method to achieve continuous shape-tunable synthesis highlights the potential of 3D-HF in nanomaterials research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available