4.8 Article

Nanoscale Imaging of Photo current and Efficiency in CdTe Solar Cells

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages 11883-11890

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn5052585

Keywords

photovoltaics; CdTe; scanning photocurrent microscopy; solar cells; NSOM

Funding

  1. University of Maryland through the University of Maryland [70NANB10H193]
  2. National Institute of Standards and Technology Center for Nanoscale Science and Technology through the University of Maryland [70NANB10H193]
  3. U.S. DOE National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-AC04-94AL85000]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The local collection characteristics of grain interiors and grain boundaries in thin-film CdTe polycrystalline solar cells are investigated using scanning photocurrent microscopy. The carriers are locally generated by light injected through a small aperture (50-300 nm) of a near-field scanning optical microscope in an illumination mode. Possible influence of rough surface topography on light coupling is examined and eliminated by sculpting smooth wedges on the granular CdTe surface. By varying the wavelength of light, nanoscale spatial variations in external quantum efficiency are mapped. We find that the grain boundaries (GBs) are better current collectors than the grain interiors (GIs). The increased collection efficiency is caused by two distinct effects associated with the material composition of GBs. First, GBs are charged, and the corresponding built-in field facilitates the separation and the extraction of the photogenerated carriers. Second, the GB regions generate more photocurrent at long wavelength corresponding to the band edge, which can be caused by a smaller local band gap. Resolving carrier collection with nanoscale resolution in solar cell materials is crucial for optimizing the polycrystalline device performance through appropriate thermal processing and passivation of defects and surfaces.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available