4.8 Article

A Proposed Mechanism of the Influence of Gold Nanoparticles on DNA Hybridization

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages 6765-6777

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn500790m

Keywords

DNA hybridization and dehybridization; gold nanoparticle (AuNP); single base-pair discrimination; NanoBioArray (NBA) chip; Langmuir model; transition state theory; surface plasmon resonance (SPR) spectroscopy

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Canada Research Chairs Program
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  4. British Columbia Knowledge Development Fund (BCKDF)
  5. Western Economic Diversification Canada
  6. SFU

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A combination of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and nucleic acids has been used in biosensing applications. However, there is a poor fundamental understanding of how gold nanoparticle surfaces influence the DNA hybridization process. Here, we measured the rate constants of the hybridization and dehybridization of DNA on gold nanoparticle surfaces to enable the determination of activation parameters using transition state theory. We show that the target bases need to be detached from the gold nanopartide surfaces before zipping. This causes a shift of the rate-limiting step of hybridization to the mismatch-sensitive zipping step. Furthermore, our results propose that the binding of gold nanoparticles to the single-stranded DNA segments (commonly known as bubbles) in the duplex DNA stabilizes the bubbles and accelerates the dehybridization process. We employ the proposed mechanism of DNA hybridization/dehybridization to explain the ability of 5 nm diameter gold nanoparticles to help discriminate between single base-pair mismatched DNA molecules when performed in a NanoBioArray chip. The mechanistic insight into the DNA gold nanoparticle hybridization/dehybridization process should lead to the development of new biosensors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available