4.8 Article

Rotational Disorder in Twisted Bilayer Graphene

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 1655-1663

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn405999z

Keywords

twisted bilayer graphene; interlayer coupling; rotational disorder; strain; Raman spectroscopy

Funding

  1. LORD program at Sandia National Laboratories (SNL)
  2. U.S. DOE Office of Basic Energy Sciences (BES), Division of Materials Science and Engineering
  3. U.S. DOE National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-AC04-94AL85000]
  4. Office of Naval Research
  5. NRL's NanoScience Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conventional means of stacking two-dimensional (2D) crystals inevitably leads to imperfections. To examine the ramifications of these imperfections, rotational disorder and strain are quantified in twisted bilayer graphene (TBG) using a combination of Raman spectroscopic and low-energy electron diffraction imaging. The twist angle between TBG layers varies on the order of 2 degrees within large (50-100 mu m) single-crystalline grains, resulting in changes of the emergent Raman response by over an order of magnitude. Rotational disorder does not evolve continuously across the large grains but rather comes about by variations in the local twist angles between differing contiguous subgrains, similar to 1 mu m in size, that themselves exhibit virtually no twist angle variation (Delta Theta similar to 0.1 degrees). Owing to weak out-of-plane van der Waals bonding between azimuthally rotated graphene layers, these subgrains evolve in conjunction with the 0.3% strain variation observed both within and between the atomic layers. Importantly, the emergent Raman response is altered, but not removed, by these extrinsic perturbations. Inter layer interactions are therefore resilient to strain and rotational disorder, a fact that gives promise to the prospect of designer 2D solid heterostructures created via transfer processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available