4.8 Article

Photoinduced Heating of Nanoparticle Arrays

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages 6478-6488

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn401924n

Keywords

plasmonics; arrays; photothermal; temperature microscopy; wavefront sensing; femtosecond pulse

Funding

  1. French agency ANR grant Tkinet [ANR 2011 BSV5 019 05]
  2. European Community's Seventh Framework Program under grant ERC-Plasmolight [259196]
  3. Fundacio privada CELLEX
  4. FPI fellowship from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN)
  5. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The temperature distribution throughout arrays of illuminated metal nanoparticles is investigated numerically and experimentally. The two cases of continuous and femtosecond-pulsed illumination are addressed. In the case of continuous illumination, two distinct regimes are evidenced: a temperature confinement regime, where the temperature increase remains confined at the vicinity of each nanosource of heat, and a temperature delocalization regime, where the temperature is uniform throughout the whole nanoparticle assembly despite the heat sources nanometric size. We show that the occurrence of one regime or another simply depends on the geometry of the nanoparticle distribution. In particular, we derived (i) simple expressions of dimensionless parameters aimed at predicting the degree of temperature confinement and (ii) analytical expressions aimed at estimating the actual temperature increase at the center of an assembly of nanoparticles under illumination, preventing heavy numerical simulations. All these theoretical results are supported by experimental measurements of the temperature distribution on regular arrays of gold nanoparticles under illumination. In the case of femtosecond-pulsed illumination, we explain the two conditions that must be fulfilled to observe a further enhanced temperature spatial confinement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available