4.8 Article

Modular Design of Redox-Responsive Stabilizers for Nanocrystals

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages 8243-8250

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn4037317

Keywords

thiol-yne; postpolymerization modification; nanocrystals; nanoparticles; paclitaxel; polyester; reactive oxygen species

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [310030_138342]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [310030_138342] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many potent drugs are difficult to administer intravenously due to poor aqueous solubility. A common approach for addressing this issue is to process them into colloidal dispersions known as nanocrystals (NCs). However, NCs possess high-energy surfaces that must be stabilized with surfactants to prevent aggregation. An optimal surfactant should have high affinity for the nanocrystal's surface to stabilize it, but may also include a trigger mechanism that could offer the possibility of altering size distribution and uptake of the NC. This study presents a modular and systematic strategy for optimizing the affinity of polymeric stabilizers for drug nanocrystals both before and after oxidation (i.e., the selected trigger), thus allowing for the optimal responsiveness for a given application to be identified. A library of 10 redox-responsive polymer stabilizers was prepared by postpolymerization modification, using the thiol-yne reaction, of two parent block copolymers. The stabilizing potential of these polymers for paclitaxel NCs is presented as well as the influence of oxidation on size and dissolution following exposure to reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are strongly associated with chronic inflammation and cancer. Owing to the versatility of postpolymerization modification, this contribution provides general tools for preparing triggered-sheddable stabilizing coatings for nanoparticles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available