4.8 Article

Origins of Activity Enhancement in Enzyme Cascades on Scaffolds

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 7, Issue 10, Pages 8658-8665

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn402823k

Keywords

enzyme cascades; nanobiotechnology; DNA scaffolds; transport processes; mathematical modeling

Funding

  1. NSF [DMR 1015486]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The concept of metabolic channeling as a result of rapid transfer of freely diffusing intermediate substrates between two enzymes on nanoscale scaffolds is examined using simulations and mathematical models. The increase in direct substrate transfer due to the proximity of the two enzymes provides an initial but temporary boost to the throughput of the cascade and loses importance as product molecules of enzyme 1 (substrate molecules of enzyme 2) accumulate in the surrounding container. The characteristic time scale at which this boost is significant is given by the ratio of container volume to the product of substrate diffusion constant and Interenzyme distance and is on the order of milliseconds to seconds in some experimental systems. However, the attachment of a large number of enzyme pairs to a scaffold provides an increased number of local targets, extending the characteristic time. If substrate molecules for enzyme 2 are sequestered by an alternative reaction in the container, a scaffold can result in a permanent boost to cascade throughput with a magnitude given by the ratio of the above-defined time scale to the lifetime of the substrate molecule in the container. Finally, a weak attractive interaction between substrate molecules and the scaffold creates a virtual compartment and substantially accelerates initial throughput. if intermediate substrates can diffuse freely, placing individual enzyme pairs on scaffolds is only beneficial in large cells, unconfined extracellular spaces or In systems with sequestering reactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available