4.8 Article

Diameter Limitation in Growth of III-Sb-Containing Nanowire Heterostructures

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages 3668-3675

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn400684p

Keywords

nanowires; III-V materials; III-Sb materials; antimonides; Gibbs-Thomson; MOVPE

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council (VR)
  2. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (SSF)
  3. VINNOVA
  4. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (KAW)
  5. Nanometer Structure Consortium at Lund University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The nanowire geometry offers significant advantages for exploiting the potential of III-Sb materials. Strain due to lattice mismatch is efficiently accommodated, and carrier confinement effects can be utilized in tunneling and quantum devices for which the III-Sb materials are of particular interest. It has however proven difficult to grow thin (below a few tens of nanometers), epitaxial III-Sb nanowires, as commonly no growth is observed below some critical diameter. Here we explore the processes limiting the diameter of III-Sb nanowires in a model system, in order to develop procedures to control this effect. The InAs-GaSb heterostructure system was chosen due to its great potential for tunneling devices in future low-power electronics. We find that with increasing growth temperature or precursor partial pressures, the critical diameter for GaSb growth on InAs decreases. To explain this trend we propose a model where the Gibbs-Thomson effect limits the Sb supersaturation in the catalyst particle. This understanding enabled us to further reduce the nanowire diameter down to 32 nm for GaSb grown on 21 nm InAs stems. Finally, we show that growth conditions must be carefully optimized for these small diameters, since radial growth increases for increased precursor partial pressures beyond the critical values required for nucleation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available