4.8 Review

Nanoimprinted Polymer Solar Cell

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages 2877-2892

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn3001388

Keywords

polymer solar cells; conjugated polymers; nanoimprint lithography; nanoscale morphology; phase separation; nanostructure geometry; chain alignment; charge carrier mobility; interface; manufacture

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [ECCS-0901759]
  2. Welch Foundation [AT-1617]
  3. DOE [DE-SC00003664]
  4. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys
  5. Directorate For Engineering [0901759] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Among the various organic photovoltaic devices, the conjugated polymer/fullerene approach has drawn the most research interest. The performance of these types of solar cells Is greatly determined by the nanoscale morphology of the two components (donor/acceptor) and the molecular orientation/crystallinity in the photoactive layer. A vertically bicontinuous and interdigitized heterojunction between donor and acceptor has been regarded as one of the ideal structures to enable both efficient charge separation and transport. Synergistic control of polymer orientation in the nanostructured heterojunction is also critical to improve the performance of polymer solar cells. Nanoimprint lithography has emerged as a new approach to simultaneously control both the heterojunction morphology and polymer chains in organic photovoltaics. Currently, in the area of nanoimprinted polymer solar cells, much progress has been achieved in the fabrication of nanostructured morphology, control of molecular orientation/crystallinity, deposition of acceptor materials, patterned electrodes, understanding of structure property correlations, and device. performance. This review article summarizes the recent studies on nanoimprinted polymer solar cells and discusses the outstanding challenges and opportunities for future work.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available