4.8 Article

Cerium Dioxide Nanoparticles Induce Apoptosis and Autophagy in Human Peripheral Blood Monocytes

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 6, Issue 7, Pages 5820-5829

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn302235u

Keywords

cerium dioxide/ceria; nanoparticle; toxicity; apoptosis; autophagy; monocytes; ultrafine

Funding

  1. NIH, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cerium dioxide nanoparticles (CeO2 NPs) have diversified industrial uses, and novel therapeutic applications are actively being pursued. There is a lack of mechanistic data concerning the effects of CeO2 NPs on primary human cells. We aimed at characterizing the cytotoxic effects of CeO2 NPs in human peripheral blood monocytes. CeO2 NPs and their suspensions were thoroughly characterized, including using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), dynamic light scattering, and zeta potential analysis. Blood from healthy human volunteers was drawn through phlebotomy, and CD14+ cells were isolated. Cells were exposed to CeO2 NPs (0.5-10 mu g/mL) for 20 or 40 h, and mechanisms of cell injury were studied. TEM revealed that CeO2 NPs are Internalized by monocytes and are found either in vesicles or free in the cytoplasm. CeO2 NP exposure leads to decrease in cell viability, and treated cells exhibit characteristic hallmarks of apoptosis (activation of Bax, loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, DNA fragmentation). CeO2 NP toxicity is caused by mitochondrial damage and overexpression of apoptosis inducing factor, but is not due to caspase activation or reactive oxygen species production. Moreover, CeO2 NP exposure leads to autophagy, which is further increased after pharmacological inhibition of tumor suppressor protein p53. Inhibition of autophagy partially reverses cell death by CeO2 NPs. It is concluded that CeO2 NPs are toxic to primary human monocytes at relatively low doses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available