4.8 Article

Measuring Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Length Distributions from Diffusional Trajectories

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 6, Issue 9, Pages 8424-8431

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn3032744

Keywords

SWCNT; single-walled carbon nanotubes; single-particle tracking; length; fluorescence; diffusion

Funding

  1. Welch Foundation [C-0807]
  2. National Science Foundation [CHE-1112374]
  3. Division Of Chemistry
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1112374] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new method is demonstrated for measuring the length distributions of dispersed single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) samples by analyzing diffusional motions of many individual nanotubes in parallel. In this method, termed length analysis by nanotube diffusion (LAND), video sequences of near-IR fluorescence microscope images showing many semiconducting SWCNTs are recorded and processed by custom image analysis software. This processing locates the individual nanotubes, tracks their translational trajectories, computes the corresponding diffusion coefficients, and converts those values to nanotube lengths. The deduced length values are then compiled into a histogram of lengths present in the sample. By using specific excitation wavelengths and emission filters, this analysis is performed on selected (n,m) structural species. The new LAND method has been found to give distributions in very good agreement with those obtained by conventional AFM analysis of the same samples. Because it is fluorescence-based, LAND monitors only semiconducting, relatively pristine SWCNTs. However, it is less sensitive to artifacts from impurities and bundled nanotubes than AFM or light scattering methods. In addition, samples can be analyzed with less time and operator attention than by AFM. LAND is a promising alternative method for characterizing length distributions of SWCNTs in liquid suspension.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available