4.8 Article

Plasmon Blockade in Nanostructured Graphene

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages 1724-1731

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn204701w

Keywords

quantum plasmonics; graphene plasmons; plasmon blockade; nonclassical plasmons; nanophotonics; strong coupling; graphene nanodisk

Funding

  1. Spanish MICINN [MAT2010-14885]
  2. European Commission [FP7-ICT-2009-4-248909-LIMA, FP7-ICT-2009-4-248855-N4E]
  3. FPU from the Spanish ME
  4. Robert A. Welch Foundation [C-1222]
  5. Center for Solar Photophysics, an Energy Frontier Research Center
  6. U.S. Department of Energy
  7. EPSRC [EP/G060363/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G060363/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Among the many extraordinary properties of graphene, its optical response allows one to easily tune its interaction with nearby molecules via electrostatic doping. The large confinement displayed by plasmons in graphene nanodisks makes It possible to reach the strong-coupling regime with a nearby quantum emitter, such as a quantum dot or a molecule. In this limit, the quantum emitter can introduce a significant plasmon plasmon interaction, which gives rise to a plasmon blockade effect. This produces, in turn, strongly nonlinear absorption cross sections and modified statistics of the bosonic plasmon mode. We characterize these phenomena by studying the equal-time second-order correlation function g((2))(0), which plunges below a value of 1, thus revealing the existence of nonclassical plasmon states. The plasmon-emitter coupling, and therefore the plasmon blockade, can be efficiently controlled by tuning the doping level of the graphene nanodisks. The proposed system emerges as a new promising platform to realize quantum plasmonic devices capable of commuting optical signals at the single-photon/plasmon level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available