4.8 Article

Highly Robust, Recyclable Displacement Assay for Mercuric Ions in Aqueous Solutions and Living Cells

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 6, Issue 12, Pages 10999-11008

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn3046192

Keywords

gold nanoparticles sensitivity; selectivity; recyclable detection; Rhodamine B isothiocyanate

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 program) [2013CB733802, 2013CB733800]
  2. National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [81101101, 51273165, 51173117, 50830107, 81171399, 81101077]
  3. National Significant New Drugs Creation Program [2012ZX09505-001-001]
  4. Jiangsu Province Social Development Program [BE2012622, BL2012031]
  5. Outstanding Professional Fund of Health Ministry in Jiangsu Province [RC2011095]
  6. Chinese Academy of Sciences [2011T2J06]
  7. Intramural Research Program (IRP) of the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB), National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We designed a recyclable Hg2+ probe based on Rhodamine B isothiocyanate (RBITC)-poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-comodified gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) with excellent robustness, selectivity, and sensitivity. On the basis of a rational design, only Hg2+ can displace RBITC from the AuNP surfaces, resulting in a remarkable enhancement of RBITC fluorescence initially quenched by AuNPs. To maintain stability and monodispersity of AuNPs in real samples, thiol-terminated PEG was employed to bind with the remaining active sites of AuNPs. Besides, this displacement assay can be regenerated by resupplying free RBITC into the AuNPs solutions that were already used for detecting Hg2+. Importantly, the detection limit of this assay for Hg2+ (2.3 nM) was lower than the maximum limits guided by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as well as that permitted by the World Health Organization. The efficiency of this probe was demonstrated in monitoring Hg2+ in complex samples such as river water and living cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available