4.8 Article

Highly Conductive, Mechanically Robust, and Electrochemically Inactive TiC/C Nanofiber Scaffold for High-Performance Silicon Anode Batteries

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 5, Issue 10, Pages 8346-8351

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn2033693

Keywords

titanium carbide; conductive scaffold; silicon anode; lithium-ion batteries; cycling stability

Funding

  1. Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Vehicle Technologies of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231, 6951379]
  2. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory [DE-AC02-76SF0051]
  3. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology [KUS-I1-001-12]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50902104]
  5. City University of Hong Kong [7008009]
  6. China Scholarship Council [2010842443]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Silicon has a high specific capacity of 4200 mAh/g as lithium-ion battery anodes, but its rapid capacity fading due to >300% volume expansion and pulverization presents a significant challenge for practical applications. Here we report a core-shell TiC/C/Si inactive/active nanocomposite for Si anodes demonstrating high specific capacity and excellent electrochemical cycling. The amorphous silicon layer serves as the active material to store Li(+), while the inactive TiC/C nanofibers act as a conductive and mechanically robust scaffold for electron transport during the Li-Si alloying process. The core-shell TiC/C/Si nanocomposite anode shows similar to 3000 rnAh g(-1) discharge capacity and 92% capacity retention after 100 charge/discharge cycles. The excellent cycling stability and high rate performance could be attributed to the tapering of the nanofibers and the open structure that allows facile Li ion transport and the high conductivity and mechanical stability of the TiC/C scaffold.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available