4.8 Article

Ultrahigh-Density Array of Silver Nanoclusters for SERS Substrate with High Sensitivity and Excellent Reproducibility

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages 249-255

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn2035236

Keywords

SERS; silver nanoclusters array; biosensing; high sensitivity and excellent reproducibility; block copolymer micelles

Funding

  1. National Creative Research Initiative of the National Research Foundation of Korea
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2004-0046408] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We introduce a simple but robust method to fabricate an ultrahigh-density array of silver nanoclusters for a surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) substrate with high sensitivity and excellent reproducibility at a very large area (wafer scale) based on polystyrene-block-poly(4-vinylpyridine) copolymer (PS-b-P4VP) micelles. After silver nitrates were incorporated into the micelle cores (P4VP) followed by the reduction to silver nanoclusters, we systematically controlled the gap distance between two neighboring silver nanoclusters ranging from 8 to 61 nm, while the diameter of each silver nanocluster was kept nearly constant (similar to 25 nm). To make a silver nanocluster array with a gap distance of 8 nm, the use of crew-cut-type micelles is required. Fabricated SERS substrate with a gap distance of 8 nm showed very high signal intensity with a SERS enhancement factor as high as 10(8), which is enough to detect a single molecule, and excellent reproducibility (less than +/-5%) of the signal intensity. This is because of the uniform size and gap distance of silver nanoclusters in a large area. The substrate could also be used for label-free immunoassays, biosensing, and nanoscale optical antennas and light sources.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available