4.8 Article

In Vitro Investigation of the Cellular Toxicity of Boron Nitride Nanotubes

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages 3800-3810

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn200139h

Keywords

MP-assay; DNA assay; FMCA assay; entanglement; tortuosity

Funding

  1. Swiss National Foundation [205321-125299/1]
  2. International Center for Materials Nanoarchitectonics (MANA) of NIMS
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [205321_125299] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanotubes present one of the most promising opportunities in nanotechnology with a plethora of applications in nanoelectronics, mechanical engineering, as well as in biomedical technology. Due to their structure and some physical properties, boron nitride (BN) nanotubes (BNNTs) possess several advantages over carbon nanotubes (CNTs), and they are now commercially produced and used on a large scale. The human and environmental exposure to BN nanomaterials is expected to increase in the near future, and their biological responses need to be examined. Using complementary mays, we have extensively investigated the effects of BNNTs on the viability and metabolic status of different cell types: on the one hand, the effects on cells present in the lung alveoli, and on the other hand, on human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells. Our results indicate that BNNTs are cytotoxic for all cell types studied and, In most cases, are more cytotoxic than CNTs in their pristine (p-CNT) and functionalized (f-CNT) form. However, the level of toxicity and the prominent morphological alterations in the cell populations withstanding BNNT exposure are cell-type-dependent. For instance, BNNTs induced extensive multinucleated giant cell formation in macrophages and increased levels of eosinophilia in fibroblasts. Finally, our results point the toxicity of tubular nanomaterials to be strongly correlated with the cellular accumulation enhanced for straight nanotubes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available