4.8 Article

In Vivo Quantitative Evaluation of the Transport Kinetics of Gold Nanocages in a Lymphatic System by Noninvasive Photoacoustic Tomography

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 5, Issue 12, Pages 9658-9667

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn203124x

Keywords

gold nanocages; sentinel lymph node; photoacoustic tomography; metastatic cancer staging

Funding

  1. NIH [DP1 OD000798, R01 EB000712, R01 EB008085, R01 CA134539, U54 CA136398]
  2. NCI [R01 CA13852701]
  3. Washington University in St. Louis
  4. St. Louis Institute for Nanomedicine (SLIN)
  5. NSF [ECS-0335765]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sentinel lymph node (SIN) biopsy has emerged as a preferred method for axillary lymph node staging of breast cancer, and imaging the SLN in three-dimensional space is a prerequisite for the biopsy. Conventional SIN mapping techniques based on the Injection of an organic dye or a suspension of radioactive colloids suffer from invasive surgical operation for visual detection of the dye or hazardous radioactive components and low spatial resolution of Geiger counters in detecting the radioactive colloids. This work systematically investigates the use of gold nanocages (AuNCs) as a novel class of optical tracers for noninvasive SIN imaging by photoacoustic (PA) tomography in a rat model. The transport of AuNCs In a lymphatic system and uptake by the SIN were evaluated by PA tomography on the axillary region of a rat. Quantification of AuNCs accumulated In the lymph node was achieved by correlating the data from PA imaging with the results from inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Several parameters were systematically evaluated and optimized, including the concentration, size, and surface charge of the AuNCs. These results are critical to the further development of this AuNC-based PA tomography system for noninvasive SIN imaging, providing valuable information for metastatic cancer staging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available