4.8 Article

Complex Capacitance Scaling in Ionic Liquids-Filled Nanopores

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 5, Issue 11, Pages 9044-9051

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn203260w

Keywords

supercapacitor; electrical double layer; room-temperature ionic liquids; anomalous enhancement; nanopores; transmission line model

Funding

  1. NSF [CBET-0756496]
  2. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL)
  3. Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences
  4. ORNL by the Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent experiments have shown that the capacitance of subnanometer pores increases anomalously as the pore width decreases, thereby opening a new avenue for developing supercapacitors with enhanced energy density. However, this behavior is still subject to some controversy since its physical origins are not well understood. Using atomistic simulations, we show that the capacitance of slit-shaped nanopores in contact with room-temperature ionic liquids exhibits a U-shaped scaling behavior In pores with widths from 0.75 to 1.26 nm. The left branch of the capacitance scaling curve directly corresponds to the anomalous capacitance Increase and thus reproduces the experimental observations. The right branch of the curve Indirectly agrees with experimental findings that so far have received little attention. The overall U-shaped scaling behavior provides insights on the origins of the difficulty in experimentally observing the pore-width-dependent capacitance. We establish a theoretical framework for understanding the capacitance of electrical double layers in nanopores and provide mechanistic details into the origins of the observed scaling behavior. The framework highlights the critical role of ion solvation in controlling pore capacitance and the importance of choosing anion/cation couples carefully for optimal energy storage in a given pore system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available