4.8 Article

Hollow Polyhedral Structures in Small Gold-Sulfide Clusters

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages 1441-1449

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn103217z

Keywords

gold-sulfide cluster anions (AumSn-); hollow polyhedron structures; ab initio methods; basin-hopping; global minima; edge-to-face evolution mechanism

Funding

  1. Xiangtan University
  2. NSF [DMR-0820521, EPS-1010094]
  3. ARO [W911NF1020099]
  4. Nebraska Research Initiative
  5. Nebraska Public Power District through the Nebraska Center for Energy Sciences Research
  6. University of Nebraska Holland's Computing Center
  7. Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy
  8. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  9. EPSCoR [1010674] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Office Of The Director [1010674] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using an Mid methods, we investigate the structural evolution of a family of gold-sulfide cluster anions (AumSn-). We show that this family of clusters exhibits simple size-evolution rules and novel hollow polyhedron structures. The highly stable AumSn- species such as Au6S4-, Au9S5- Au9S6-, Au10S6-, Au11S6-, Au12S8-, and Au13S8- detected in the recent ion mobility mass spectrometry experiment of Au-25(SCH2CH2Ph)(18) (Angel et al. AG Nano 2010, 4, 4691) are found to possess either quasi-tetrahedron, pyramidal, quasi-triangular prism, or quasi-cuboctahedron structures. The formation of these polyhedron structures are attributed to the high stability of the S-Au-S structural unit. A unique edge-to-face growth mechanism is proposed to understand the structural evolution of the small AumSn- cluster. A 3:2 ratio rule of Au/S is suggested for the formation of a hollow polyhedron structure among small-sized AumSn clusters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available