4.8 Article

Structure and Orientation of Interfacial Water Determine Atomic Force Microscopy Results: Insights from Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 2215-2223

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn103454m

Keywords

force spectroscopy; alumina; carbon nanotubes; water structure

Funding

  1. Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0001902]
  2. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Massive all-atom molecular dynamics simulations were employed to study hydration forces near alpha-Al2O3 (0001) surfaces as sampled during a hypothetical AFM force spectroscopy experiment conducted using, a (28,0)single-walled carbon nanotube as the tip at ambient conditions. The results provide the-force acting on the carbon nanotube tip, as well as detailed properties of interfacial water, as a function of the nanotube-surface distance. As the tip approaches the solid substrate, interfacial water undergoes conformational and structural changes. These changes are responsible for the features observed in the force profiles, including the range at which forces can be measured (up to two hydration shells), the intensity of the forces experienced by the AFM tip, and their oscillatory,character. Our detailed analysis shows that heterogeneous surface chemical composition results in appreciably different force profiles. This observation may explain the variability of AFM data sampling hydration forces even on atomically smooth substrates. In addition, our results suggest that sufficiently accurate AFM force spectroscopy could be used to study how hydration forces depend on surface heterogeneous properties and on the orientation and local density of interfacial water, which could aid our understanding of interfacial phenomena and lead to significant scientific breakthroughs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available