4.8 Article

Modeling of Thermal Transport in Pillared-Graphene Architectures

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages 1153-1161

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn901341r

Keywords

pillared-graphene; carbon nanotubes; graphene; molecular dynamics; thermal transport; phonon scattering; thermal management

Funding

  1. US Air Force Office of Scientific Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon nanotubes (CNT) and graphene are considered as potential future candidates for many nano/microscale integrated devices due to their superior thermal properties. Both systems, however, exhibit significant anisotropy in their thermal conduction, limiting their performance as three-dimensional thermal transport materials. From thermal management perspective, one way to tailor this anisotropy is to consider designing alternative carbon-based architectures. This paper investigates the thermal transport in one such novel architecture-a pillared-graphene (PG) network nanostructure which combines graphene sheets and carbon nanotubes to create a three-dimensional network. Nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations have been carried out using the AIREBO potential to calculate the thermal conductivity of pillared-graphene structures along parallel (in-plane) as well as perpendicular (out-of-plane) directions with respect to the graphene plane. The resulting thermal conductivity values for PG systems are discussed and compared with simulated values for pure CNT and graphite. Our results show that in these PG structures, the thermal transport is governed by the minimum interpillar distance and the CNT-pillar length, This is primarily attributed to scattering of phonons occurring at the CNT-graphene junctions in these nanostructures. We foresee that such architecture could potentially be used as a template for designing future structurally stable microscale systems with tailorable in-plane and out-of-plane thermal transport.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available