4.8 Article

Concerted Emission and Local Potentiometry of Light-Emitting Electrochemical Cells

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages 2673-2680

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn1003315

Keywords

light-emitting electrochemical cells (LECs); planar; electroluminescence; photoluminescence; atomic force microscopy (AFM); scanning Kelvin probe microscopy (SKPM); organic electronic devices; electrogenerated chemiluminescence; operation mechanism; electrode; metal work function

Funding

  1. NSF [DMR-0120967, DMR-0449422, CHE0725139]
  2. DOE
  3. AFOSR
  4. Camille Dreyfus Teacher-Scholar Awards
  5. Cottrell Scholar of the Research Corporation
  6. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  7. Center for Nanotechnology at the University of Washington [DGE-0504573]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study the operation of polymer light-emitting electrochemical cells (LECs) by combining scanning Kelvin probe microscopy with in situ imaging of the electroluminescence and photoluminescence on planar LECs. By combining these techniques on the same device in the same apparatus we directly map the relationship between the spatial distribution of electroluminescence and the local potential profile across the device. We find that the electroluminescence is always associated with a region of potential drop in LECs made with poly[2-methoxy-5-(3',7'-dimethyl-octyloxy)-p-phenylenevinylene] (MDMO-PPV), poly(ethylene oxide)(PEO), and potassium trifluoromethanesulfonate. Nevertheless, depending on the electrode metal used, we also find significant potential drops at or near the electrode/organic interfaces. We study the effects of using different electrodes and show that both the electroluminescence and potential profiles are strongly dependent on the electrode work function for thin junctions operated at low potentials. These results indicate injection barriers can affect the operation of LECs even in the presence of doping.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available