4.8 Article

Probing the Cooperative Nature of the Conductive Components in Polystyrene/Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): Poly(styrene sulfonate)-Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Composites

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages 2242-2248

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn901643h

Keywords

nanocomposite; carbon nanotubes; conductive polymers; percolation

Funding

  1. Dutch Polymer Institute (DPI) [529]
  2. SARChI of the Department of Science and Technology
  3. NRF

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The percolation threshold of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) introduced into polystyrene (PS) via a latex-based route has been reduced by using conductive surfactants. The use of the conductive polymeric latex, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS), in conjunction with SWCNTs leads to conductive composites with loadings of both constituents below their own individual percolation thresholds. The high concentration of PEDOT:PSS in the final composites raises the concern that the composite conductivity is a result of the presence of the PEDOT:PSS alone. To elucidate the cooperative nature of the two conductive components, the contribution of the SWCNTs to the overall composite conductivity is investigated by replacing the original high-quality SWCNTs with SWCNTs of a lower quality. Percolation thresholds recorded for systems utilizing the lower quality tubes stabilized with nonconductive surfactants were over 2 wt % SWCNTs (4 times that of previously reported systems). The introduction of PEDOT:PSS was, once again, found to lower the percolation threshold (to 0.3 wt %) and to increase the ultimate conductivity up to the level of a pure PEDOT:PSS/PS blend. In the PS/PEDOT:PSS-SWCNT systems, the role of the SWCNT network is proposed to be limited to the formation of a template or scaffold on which a (more or less) continuous PEDOT:PSS layer deposits. The ultimate conductivity is therefore determined by the PEDOT:PSS alone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available