4.8 Article

Preparation and Characterization of Nanomaterials for Sustainable Energy Production

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 4, Issue 10, Pages 5517-5526

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn102420c

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy [DE-FG02-08ER15987]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20990223]
  3. Danish Research Agency
  4. Villum Kann Rasmussen Foundation
  5. McAllister Technical Services (USA)
  6. SPECS (Germany)
  7. Villum Kann Rasmussen, and the Carlsberg Foundation
  8. European Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of nanotechnology to develop a suite of sustainable energy production schemes is one of the most important scientific challenges of the 21st century. The challenge is to design, to synthesize, and to characterize new functional nanomaterials with controllable sizes, shapes, and/or structures. To summarize the progress of the research and development made in this important field, the Fuel Chemistry Division of the American Chemical Society (ACS) organized a symposium on Nanotechnology for Sustainable Energy and Fuels during the 240th ACS National Meeting in Boston, MA on August 22-26, 2010, with the ACS Catalysis Division as the cosponsor. This symposium was a global gathering of leading scientists at the intersection of energy and nanotechnology. The topics discussed at the symposium included nanotechnology, not only for traditional fossil fuel production but also for novel processes for renewable energy applications. This article aims to highlight some of the most exciting advances presented at the symposium, including the preparation and characterization of nanomaterials for clean fuel production, CO(2) capture, solar cells and solar fuels, energy conversion and storage materials, hydrogen storage materials, and fuel cells. Finally, possible future developments in this important and timely area are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available