4.8 Article

Gene Expression, Biodistribution, and Pharmacoscintigraphic Evaluation of Chondroitin Sulfate-PEI Nanoconstructs Mediated Tumor Gene Therapy

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages 1493-1505

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn900044f

Keywords

PEI; chondroitin sulfate; transfection; cytotoxicity; biodistribution; solid tumor

Funding

  1. CSIR Task Force Project [NWP035]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tumor-specific gene delivery constitutes a primary challenge in nonviral mediated gene therapy. In this investigation, branched polyethylenimine (bPEI, 25 kDa) was modified by forming nanoconstructs with a natural polysaccharide, chondroitin sulfate (CS), to impart site-specific property. A library of CS-PEI (CP) nanoconstructs was fabricated by altering the content of CS and evaluated in terms of size, surface charge, morphology, pDNA loading efficiency, pDNA release assay, pDNA protection study, cytotoxicity, and transfection efficiency. In vitro transfection efficiency of CP nanoconstructs was examined in HEK293, HEK293T, HepG2, and HeLa cell lines, while their cytotoxicity was investigated in HepG2 and HeLa cells. DNase I protection assay showed that the plasmid was protected from degradation over a period of time. The CP nanoconstructs possess significantly lower toxicity and enhanced transfection efficiency compared to PEI (25 kDa) and commercial transfection reagents (i.e., superfect, fugene, and GenePORTER 2). Further, the CP nanoconstructs were also found to transfect cells in serum-containing medium. In vivo studies were carried out with pDNA loaded CP-3 nanoconstruct after intravenous (iv) injection in Ehrlich ascites tumor (EAT)-bearing mice. The outcome revealed higher concentration of CP-3 nanoconstruct in tumor mass. These findings demonstrate that CP nanoconstructs could be exploited as carriers for nanomedicine for efficient management of solid tumor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available