4.8 Article

Single-Molecule Bonds Characterized by Solid-State Nanopore Force Spectroscopy

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 3, Issue 10, Pages 3009-3014

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn900713a

Keywords

nanopore; force spectroscopy; molecular interactions; avidin-biotin; biosensors; biophysics

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 HG003248]
  2. NSERC
  3. FQRNT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Weak Molecular interactions drive processes at the core of living systems, such as enzyme-substrate interactions, receptor-ligand binding, and nucleic acid replication. Single-molecule force spectroscopy is a remarkable tool for revealing molecular scale energy landscapes of noncovalent bonds, by exerting a mechanical force directly on an individual molecular complex and tracking its survival as a function of time and applied force. In principle, force spectroscopy methods can also be used for highly specific molecular recognition assays by directly characterizing the strength of bonds between probe and target molecules: However, complexity and low throughput of conventional force spectroscopy techniques render such biosensing applications impractical. Here we demonstrate a straightforward single-molecule approach, suitable for both biophysical studies and molecular recognition assays, in which a similar to 3 nm silicon nitride nanopore is used to determine the bond lifetime spectrum of the biotin-neutravidin complex. Thousands of individual-molecular complexes are captured and dissociated in the solid-state nanopore under constant applied forces, ranging from 400 to 900 mV, allowing us to extract the location of the energy barrier that governs the interaction, mapped at Delta x approximate to 0.5 nm. These results highlight the capacity of a solid-state nanopore to detect and characterize intermolecular interactions and demonstrate how this could be applied to rapid, highly specific molecular detection assays.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available