4.8 Article

Cellular Uptake of Densely Packed Polymer Coatings on Gold Nanoparticles

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 403-413

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn9011237

Keywords

gold nanoparticle; living radical polymerization; polymer assembly on gold nanoparticles; Caco-2 cell; uptake of coated nanoparticles

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DP878733]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A variety of functional polymer chains prepared by RAFT were directly grafted onto 5, 10, and 20 mm gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). The polymer shell coating the AMPS was densely packed because of the strong binding between the trithioester groups on the polymer chain-ends and gold. It was found that due to the densely packed nature of the shell the polymer chains were significantly stretched compared to their usual Gaussian coil conformation in water. This was even evident for polymer chains where ionic repulsion between neighboring chains should be significant. Therefore, with such high grafting densities the surface properties and size of the hybrid nanoparticles should be the only contributing factors in cellular uptake in epithelial Caco-2 cells. This study has provided valuable insight into the effects of charge and size of NIPS for the application of NPs in the delivery of therapeutic agents across the intestine. Our results showed that the negatively charged AuNPs were taken up by the cells with greater efficiency than the neutral AuNPs, most probably due to binding with membrane proteins. The positively charged AuNPs as expected gave the greatest uptake efficiency. Interestingly, the uptake for PNIPAM-AuNPs (hydrophobic coating at 37 degrees C) increased from approximately 2% efficiency after a 30 min incubation to 8% after 2 h, and was much greater than the negative or neutral AuNPs. We believe that this was due to the interplay between the hydrophobic nature of the NIPS and their increased size.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available