4.8 Article

Challenges in Fabrication of Mesoporous Carbon Films with Ordered Cylindrical Pores via Phenolic Oligomer Self-Assembly with Triblock Copolymers

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 189-198

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn9012884

Keywords

mesostructure; phenol formaldehyde resin; self-assembly; mesoporous materials; thin film

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CBET-0746664]
  2. NSF of China
  3. NSERC Canada
  4. NIST-NRC
  5. NIST Office of Microelectronics Programs
  6. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH1 1357]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mesoporous phenol formaldehyde (PF) polymer resin and carbon films are prepared by a solution self-assembly of PF oligomers with amphiphilic triblock copolymers. After thermopolymerization of the PF to cross-link the network, the films show an ordered morphology as determined by X-ray diffraction and,grazing incidence small-angle X-ray scattering (GISAXS). Our results show that the amphiphilic triblock copolymer template greatly influences the stability of the final porous mescistructures. The pyrolysis of the two-dimensional (2-D) hexagonal, films with p6mm symmetry templated by Pluronic F127 yields a disordered porous structure following the template removal. Conversely, films templated by Pluronic P123 can exhibit well-ordered cylindrical pores after the template removal, but the solution composition range to yield ordered cylindrical mesopores is significantly reduced (nearly 70%) for thin films in comparison to bulk powders. We propose two dominant difficulties in fabricating well-ordered cylindrical mesopores In films: first, the stress from contraction during the pyrolysis can lead to a collapse of the mescistructure if the wall thickness is insufficient, and second, the surface wetting behavior in thin films leads to a small compositional range.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available