4.6 Review

The nature, scope and impact of genomic prediction in beef cattle in the United States

Journal

GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION
Volume 43, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-43-17

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. United States Department of Agriculture, National Research Initiative [USDA-NRI-2009-03924]
  2. Agriculture and Food Research Initiative from the National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2009-35205-05100]
  3. Iowa Agricultural and Home Economic Experiment Station, Ames, IA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Artificial selection has proven to be effective at altering the performance of animal production systems. Nevertheless, selection based on assessment of the genetic superiority of candidates is suboptimal as a result of errors in the prediction of genetic merit. Conventional breeding programs may extend phenotypic measurements on selection candidates to include correlated indicator traits, or delay selection decisions well beyond puberty so that phenotypic performance can be observed on progeny or other relatives. Extending the generation interval to increase the accuracy of selection reduces annual rates of gain compared to accurate selection and use of parents of the next generation at the immediate time they reach breeding age. Genomic prediction aims at reducing prediction errors at breeding age by exploiting information on the transmission of chromosome fragments from parents to selection candidates, in conjunction with knowledge on the value of every chromosome fragment. For genomic prediction to influence beef cattle breeding programs and the rate or cost of genetic gains, training analyses must be undertaken, and genomic prediction tools made available for breeders and other industry stakeholders. This paper reviews the nature or kind of studies currently underway, the scope or extent of some of those studies, and comments on the likely predictive value of genomic information for beef cattle improvement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available