4.6 Article

Differential Effects of Allosteric M1 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Agonists on Receptor Activation, Arrestin 3 Recruitment, and Receptor Downregulation

Journal

ACS CHEMICAL NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 1, Issue 8, Pages 542-551

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cn100011e

Keywords

Muscarinic; acetylcholine; receptor; allosteric; arrestin; internalization

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [NS030454, F30AG297313]
  2. Pharmaceutical and Research Manufacturers of America (PhRMA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) are drug targets for multiple neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disorders, but the full therapeutic potential of mAChR-targeted drugs has not been realized, mainly because of a lack of subtype-selective agonists. Recent advances have allowed the development of highly selective agonists that bind to an allosteric site on the M mAChR that is spatially distinct from the orthosteric acetylcholine binding site, but less is known about the profile of intracellular signals activated by orthosteric versus allosteric M mACh R agonists. We investigated the activation and regulatory mechanisms of two structurally distinct allosteric M mAChR agonists, AC260584 and TBPB. We show that allosteric agonists potently activate multiple signal transduction pathways linked to the M-1 mAChR receptor but, compared to orthosteric agonists, much less efficiently recruit arrestin 3, a protein involved in the regulation of G-protein coupled receptor signaling. Consistent with decreased arrestin recruitment, both allosteric agonists showed blunted responses in measurements of receptor desensitization, internalization, and downregulation. These results advance the understanding of mAChR biology and may shed light on unanticipated differences in the pharmacology of orthosteric versus allosteric agonists that might be capitalized upon for drug development for the treatment of CNS diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available