4.8 Article

Bromine Doping as an Efficient Strategy to Reduce the Interfacial Defects in Hybrid Two-Dimensional/Three-Dimensional Stacking Perovskite Solar Cells

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 10, Issue 37, Pages 31755-31764

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b09461

Keywords

2D/3D stacking structure; doping; interfacial defect; charge recombination; perovskite solar cell

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51402036, 51773025]
  2. International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China [2013DFA51000]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Solar-to-electricity conversion efficiency, power conversion efficiency (PCE), and stability are two important aspects of perovskite solar cells (PSCs). However, both aspects are difficult to simultaneously enhance. In the recent two years, two-dimensional (2D)/three-dimensional (3D) stacking structure, designed by covering the 3D perovskite with a thin 2D perovskite capping layer, was reported to be a promising method to achieve both a higher PCE and improved stability simultaneously. However, when reducing the surface defects of 3D perovskite, the thin 2D capping layer itself may probably introduce additional interfacial defects in a 2D/3D stacking structure, which is thought to be able to trigger trap-assisted nonradiative recombination or ion migration. Thus, efforts should be paid to reduce the interfacial defects of 2D hybrid perovskite when serving as a modification layer in a 2D/3D stacking structure PSCs. Here, we demonstrate that bromine (Br) doping of the 2D perovskite capping layer is an efficient strategy to passivate interfacial defects robustly, by which the photoluminescence lifetime is enhanced notably, whereas the interfacial charge recombination is suppressed a lot. As a result, the PCE is enhanced from 18.01% (3D perovskite) to 20.07% (Br-doped 2D/3D perovskite) along with improved moisture stability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available