4.8 Article

Irradiation Damage Determined Field Emission of Ion Irradiated Carbon Nanotubes

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 6, Issue 7, Pages 5137-5143

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am500370b

Keywords

carbon nanotube; ion irradiation; dpa; field emission; defect

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51302187, 51302188, 11204215, 51272176]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2010CB832905]
  3. Tianjin High School Science AMP
  4. Technology Foundation [20120312]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin Normal University [5RL119]
  6. Key Project of Tianjin Natural Science Foundation of China [13JCZDJC33900, 12JCYBJC32500]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Figuring out the underlying relationship between the field emission (FE) properties and the ion irradiation induced structural change of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) is of great importance in developing high-performance field emitters. We report here the FE properties of Si and C ion irradiated CNTs with different irradiation doses. It is found that the FE performance of the ion irradiated CNTs ameliorates before and deteriorates after an irradiation-ion species related dose. The improved FE properties are ascribed to the increased amount of defects, while the degraded FE performance is attributed to the great shape change of CNTs. These two structural changes are further characterized by a structural damage related parameter: dpa (displacement per atom), and the FE performance of the ion irradiated CNTs is surprisingly found to be mainly dependent on the dpa. The optimal dpa for FE of the ion irradiated CNTs is similar to 0.60. We ascribe this to the low irradiation doses and the low substrate temperature that make the ion irradiation play a more important role in producing defects rather than element doping. Furthermore, the ion irradiated CNTs exhibit excellent FE stability, showing promising prospects in practical applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available