4.8 Article

Highly Efficient Polymer-Based Optoelectronic Devices Using PEDOT:PSS and a GO Composite Layer as a Hole Transport Layer

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages 2067-2073

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am4051487

Keywords

PEDOT:PSS; graphene oxide (GO); polymer solar cells (PSCs); polymer light-emitting diodes (PLEDs)

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (MSIP), Korea [2012R1A2A2A06046931]
  2. KIST-UNIST [2.130400.01]
  3. UNIST (Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology) [1.130061.01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We demonstrate highly efficient polymer light-emitting diodes (PLEDs), as well as polymer solar cells (PSCs), using a solution-processable poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS):graphene oxide (GO) (PEDOT:GO) composite layer as hole transport layers (HTLs). The PEDOT:GO composite HTL layer shows enhanced charge carrier transport due to improved conductivity by benzoid-quinoid transitions with a well-matched work function between GO (4.89 eV) and PEDOT:PSS (4.95 eV). Moreover, it reduces remarkably exciton quenching and suppresses recombinations that bring higher charge extraction in PSCs and increases the recombinations of holes and electrons within the active layer by the blocking behavior of the electrons from a fluorescent semiconductor due to the existence of GO with large bandgap (similar to 3.6 eV) in the PEDOT:GO composite layer, therefore leading to an enhancement of device efficiency in PLEDs and PSCs. The optimized PLEDs and PSCs with a PEDOT:GO composite HTL layer shows the maximum luminous efficiency of 21.74 cd/A (at 6.4 V) for PLEDs, as well as the power conversion efficiency of 8.21% for PSCs, which were improved by similar to 220 and 12%, respectively, compared to reference PLEDs and PSCs with a PEDOT:PSS layer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available