4.8 Article

First-Principles Analysis of Defect-Mediated Li Adsorption on Graphene

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 6, Issue 23, Pages 21141-21150

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am506008w

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Center for Electrochemical Energy Science, an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To evaluate the possible utility of single layer graphene for applications in Li ion batteries, an extensive series of periodic density functional theory (DFT) calculations are performed on graphene sheets with both point and extended defects for a wide range of lithium coverages. Consistent with recent reports, it is found that Li adsorption on defect-free single layer graphene is not thermodynamically favorable compared to bulk metallic Li. However, graphene surfaces activated by defects are generally found to bind Li more strongly, and the interaction strength is sensitive to both the nature of the defects and their densities. Double vacancy defects are found to have much stronger interactions with Li as compared to Stone-Wales defects, and increasing defect density also enhances the interaction of the Stone-Wales defects with Li. Li interaction with one-dimensional extended defects on graphene is additionally found to be strong and leads to increased Li adsorption. A rigorous thermodynamic analysis of these data establishes the theoretical Li storage capacities of the defected graphene structures. In some cases, these capacities are found to approach, although not exceed, those of graphite. The results provide new insights into the fundamental physics of adsorbate interactions with graphene defects and suggest that careful defect engineering of graphene might, ultimately, provide anode electrodes of suitable capacity for lithium ion battery applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available