4.8 Article

Substrate Stiffness Together with Soluble Factors Affects Chondrocyte Mechanoresponses

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 6, Issue 18, Pages 16106-16116

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am504135b

Keywords

substrate stiffness; chondroryte; actin; focal adhesion; traction force; stretch

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31130021, 31300773]
  2. China Postdoc Grant [2013M532152]
  3. Chongqing Postdoc Grant [Xm201352]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tissue cells sense and respond to differences in substrate stiffness. In chondrocytes, it has been shown that substrate stiffness regulates cell spreading, proliferation, chondrogenic gene expression, and TGF-beta signaling. But how the substrate stiffness together with soluble factors influences the mechanical properties of chondrocyte is still unclear. In this study, we cultured goat articular chondrocytes on polyacrylamide gels of 1, 11, and 90 kPa (Young's modulus), and measured cellular stiffness, traction force, and response to stretch in the presence of TGF-beta 1 or IL-1 beta. We found that TGF-beta 1 increased cellular stiffness and traction force and enhanced the response to stretch, while IL-1 beta increased cellular stiffness, but lowered traction force and weakened the response to stretch. Importantly, the effects of TGF-beta 1 on chondrocyte mechanics were potent in cells cultured on 90 kPa substrates, while the effects of IL-1 beta were potent on 1 kPa substrates. We also demonstrated that such changes of chondrocyte mechanoresponse were due to not only the changes of actin cytoskeleton and focal adhesion, but also the alteration of chondrocyte extracellular matrix synthesis. Taken together, these results provide insights into how chondrocytes integrate physical and biochemical cues to regulate their biomechanical behavior, and thus have implications for the design of optimized mechanical and biochemical microenvironments for engineered cartilage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available