4.8 Article

Thin-Film and Bulk Investigations of LiCoBO3 as a Li-Ion Battery Cathode

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 6, Issue 14, Pages 10840-10848

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am500860a

Keywords

LiCoBO3; LiFeBO3; cathode; thin film; d(7) trigonal-bipyramidal ion

Funding

  1. Northeastern Center for Chemical Energy Storage, an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), BES [DE-SC0001294]
  2. Materials Sciences and Engineering Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. DOE
  3. UT-Battelle, LLC
  4. DOE [DE-AC02-98CH10886]
  5. DOE Solar Photochemistry program at SBU [DE-FG02-11ER16266]
  6. DOE Solar Photochemistry program at BNL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The compound LiCoBO3 is an appealing candidate for next-generation Li-ion batteries based on its high theoretical specific capacity of 215 mAh/g and high expected discharge voltage (more than 4 V vs Li+/Li). However, this level of performance has not yet been realized in experimental cells, even with nanosized particles. Reactive magnetron sputtering was therefore used to prepare thin films of LiCoBO3, allowing the influence of the particle thickness on the electrochemical performance to be explicitly tested. Even when ultrathin films (similar to 15 nm) were prepared, there was a negligible electrochemical response from LiCoBO3. Impedance spectroscopy measurements suggest that the conductivity of LiCoBO3 is many orders of magnitude worse than that of LiFeBO3 and may severely limit the performance. The unusual blue color of LiCoBO3 was investigated by spectroscopic techniques, which allowed the determination of a charge-transfer optical gap of 4.2 eV and the attribution of the visible light absorption peak at 2.2 eV to spin-allowed d -> d transitions (assigned as overlapping (4)A(2)' to (4)A(2)'' and E-4 '' final states based on ligand-field modeling).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available