4.8 Article

Evaluating the Top Electrode Material for Achieving an Equivalent Oxide Thickness Smaller than 0.4 nm from an Al-Doped TiO2 Film

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 6, Issue 23, Pages 21632-21637

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am506677e

Keywords

atomic layer deposition; Al-doped TiO2; dead-layer effect; equivalent oxide thickness; RuO2; Pt; postmetallization anneal

Funding

  1. Future Semiconductor Device Technology Development Program - MOTIE (Ministry of Trade, Industry, Energy) [10047231]
  2. KSRC (Korea Semiconductor Research Consortium)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of Pt and RuO2 top electrodes on the electrical properties of capacitors with Al-doped TiO2 (ATO) films grown on the RuO2 bottom electrode by an atomic layer deposition method were examined. The rutile phase ATO films with high bulk dielectric constant (>80) were well-grown because of the local epitaxial relationship with the rutile structured RuO2 bottom electrode. However, the interface between top electrode and ATO was damaged during the sputtering process of the top electrode, resulting in the decrease in the dielectric constant. Postmetallization annealing at 400 degrees C was performed to mitigate the sputtering damage. During the postmetallization annealing, the ATO layer near the RuO2 top electrode/ATO interface was well-crystallized because of the structural compatibility between RuO2 and rutile ATO, while the ATO layer near the Pt top electrode/ATO interface still exhibited an amorphous-like structure. Despite the same thickness of the ATO films, therefore, the capacitors with RuO2 top electrodes showed higher capacitance compared to the capacitors with Pt top electrodes. Eventually, an extremely low equivalent oxide thickness of 0.37 nm with low enough leakage current density (<1 x 10-7 A/cm(2) at 0.8 V) and physical thickness of 8.7 nm for the next-generation dynamic random access memory was achieved from ATO films with RuO2 top electrodes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available