4.8 Article

Understanding Side Reactions in K-O2 Batteries for Improved Cycle Life

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 6, Issue 21, Pages 19299-19307

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am505351s

Keywords

metal-air batteries; potassium-oxygen battery; side reactions; O-2 crossover; ion selective separator

Funding

  1. Honda Research Institute USA
  2. CNM Carbon Cluster at Argonne National Laboratory
  3. ALCF Fusion Cluster at Argonne National Laboratory
  4. Joint Center for Energy Storage Research (JCESR), an Energy Innovation Hub - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Superoxide based metal-air (or metal-oxygen) batteries, including potassium and sodium-oxygen batteries, have emerged as promising alternative chemistries in the metal-air battery family because of much improved round-trip efficiencies (>90%). In order to improve the cycle life of these batteries, it is crucial to understand and control the side reactions between the electrodes and the electrolyte. For potassium-oxygen batteries using ether-based electrolytes, the side reactions on the potassium anode have been identified as the main cause of battery failure. The composition of the side products formed on the anode, including some reaction intermediates, have been identified and quantified. Combined experimental studies and density functional theory (DFT) calculations show the side reactions are likely driven by the interaction of potassium with ether molecules and the crossover of oxygen from the cathode. To inhibit these side reactions, the incorporation of a polymeric potassium ion selective membrane (Nafion-K+) as a battery separator is demonstrated that significantly improves the battery cycle life. The K-O-2 battery with the Nafion-K+ separator can be discharged and charged for more than 40 cycles without increases in charging overpotential.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available