4.2 Article

Association between CARD8 rs2043211 Polymorphism and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Meta-Analysis

Journal

IMMUNOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages 253-264

Publisher

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/08820139.2014.988721

Keywords

CARD8; inflammatory bowel disease; meta-analysis; polymorphism

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81102192, 81172764]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether caspase recruitment domain-containing protein 8 (CARD8) rs2043211 polymorphism was associated with susceptibility to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods: Relevant studies were searched using PubMed and Embase up to February 2014. A meta-analysis was conducted on the association between rs2043211 polymorphism and IBD using: (1) allele contrast, (2) the dominant model, (3) the recessive model, and (4) homozygote contrast. The pooled estimated of risk was obtained by random-effects model or fixed-effects model. Publication bias was assessed by Egger's test. Results: Eight relevant articles with a total of 10 534 IBD patients [6785 Crohn's disease (CD), 3713 ulcerative colitis (UC) and 36 indeterminate colitis (IC)] and 6755 healthy controls were included in the meta-analysis, which consisted of 12 studies, 12 for CD, 10 for UC, 2 for IC. There was no significant association between rs2043211 polymorphism and IBD, CD, and IC in overall population. However, stratified meta-analysis by ethnicity showed significant association between rs2043211 polymorphism and CD in the European population under the dominant model [odds ratio (OR) = 1.210, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.013-1.445, p = 0.036] and homozygote contrast (OR = 1.212, 95% CI = 1.005-1.461, p = 0.044). Conclusions: Our meta-analysis results indicated significant association between rs2043211 polymorphism and the susceptibility to CD under the dominant model and homozygote contrast in the European population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available