4.8 Article

Uniform Growth of High-Quality Oxide Thin Films on Graphene Using a CdSe Quantum Dot Array Seeding Layer

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 6, Issue 15, Pages 13015-13022

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am502922w

Keywords

graphene; CdSe quantum dot; contact resistance; seeding layer; oxide thin film

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean Government [20090081018, 20090094023, 20090083540, 2012R1A2A1A03006049, 2013R1A1A2065629]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2013R1A1A2065629, 2012R1A2A1A03006049] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Graphene displays outstanding properties as an electrode and a semiconducting channel material for transistors; however, the weak interfacial bond between graphene and an inorganic oxide material-based insulator presents a major constraint on these applications. Here, we report a new approach to improving the interface between the two materials using a CdSe quantum dot (QD)-based seeding layer in an inorganic material-graphene junction. CdSe QDs were electrochemically grown on graphene without degrading the properties of the graphene layer. The graphene structure was then used as the electrode in an oxide semiconductor by depositing a zinc oxide thin film onto the graphene coated with a QD seed layer (QD/G). The zinc oxide film adhered strongly to the graphene layer and provided a low contact resistance. A high-k dielectric layer in the form of an HfO2 film, which is an essential element in the fabrication of high-performance graphene-based field effect transistors, was also uniformly formed on the QD/G sheet using atomic layer deposition. The resulting transistors provided a relatively good performance, yielding hole and electron mobilities of 2600 and 2000 cm(2)/V.s.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available