4.8 Article

Availability of the Basal Planes of Graphene Oxide Determines Whether It Is Antibacterial

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 6, Issue 15, Pages 13183-13190

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am503070z

Keywords

graphene; antimicrobial; adsorption; mechanism; cytotoxicity

Funding

  1. NSFC [11074178, 21174138]
  2. Ministry of Education of China [NCET-13-0547, WK2060140008, WK2060200012]
  3. Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation [1308085QB28]
  4. AFOSR [FA9550-13-1-0083]
  5. ONR [N000141310575]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There are significant controversies on the antibacterial properties of graphene oxide (GO): GO was reported to be bactericidal in saline, whereas its activity in nutrient broth was controversial. To unveil the mechanisms underlying these contradictions, we performed antibacterial assays under comparable conditions. In saline, bare GO sheets were intrinsically bactericidal, yielding a bacterial survival percentage of <1% at 200 mu g/mL. Supplementing saline with <= 10% Luria-Bertani (LB) broth, however, progressively deactivated its bactericidal activity depending on LB-supplementation ratio. Supplementation of 10% LB made GO completely inactive; instead, similar to 100-fold bacterial growth was observed. Atomic force microscopy images showed that certain LB components were adsorbed on GO basal planes. Using bovine serum albumin and tryptophan as well-defined model adsorbates, we found that noncovalent adsorption on GO basal planes may account for the deactivation of GO's bactericidal activity. Moreover, this deactivation mechanism was shown to be extrapolatable to GO's cytotoxicity against mammalian cells. Taken together, our observations suggest that bare GO intrinsically kills both bacteria and mammalian cells and noncovalent adsorption on its basal planes may be a global deactivation mechanism for GO's cytotoxicity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available