4.8 Article

Hole Defects and Nitrogen Doping in Graphene: Implication for Supercapacitor Applications

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 5, Issue 21, Pages 11184-11193

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am403427h

Keywords

supercapacitors; graphene; hole; doping

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11174242]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK2010499, BK2012255, BY2013064, BK20130458, BK20130431]
  3. CETV
  4. guoshi.-com
  5. Scholarship Award for Excellent Doctoral Student granted by the Ministry of Education of China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One great challenge for supercapacitor is to achieve high energy capacity and fast charge/discharge rates simultaneously. Porous graphene with large surface area is a promising candidate for electrode materials of supercapacitor. Using first-principles calculations and non-equilibrium Green's function technique, we have explored the formation energies, mechanical properties, diffusion behaviors and electrical conductance of graphene sheets with various hole defects and/or nitrogen doping. Interestingly, graphene sheets with pyridinic-like holes (especially hexagonal holes) can be more easily doped with nitrogen and still retain the excellent mechanical properties of pristine graphene that is beneficial for the long cycle life. Porous graphene electrode with moderate hole diameter of 4.2-10 angstrom facilitates efficient access of electrolyte and exhibit excellent rate capability. In addition, doping with nitrogen as electron donors or proton attractors leads to charge accumulation and generates higher pseudocapacitance. Transmission coefficients of N-doped graphene sheets with pyridinic-like holes are only moderately reduced with regard to that of pristine geometry parameters. Overall, N-doped graphene with pyridinic-like holes exhibits energy storage in supercapacitor devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available