3.8 Article

Advanced Practice Nursing, Health Care Teams, and Perceptions of Team Effectiveness

Journal

HEALTH CARE MANAGER
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages 215-226

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HCM.0b013e318225e03a

Keywords

advanced practice nursing; health care; perceptions of team effectiveness; process; teams

Funding

  1. Center for Training and Expertise in Nursing Administration Research
  2. Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center
  3. Fonds de la recherche en Santedu Quebec
  4. Canadian Health Services Research Foundation/Canadian Institutes of Health Research Chair Program in Advanced Practice Nursing for her doctoral studies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article summarizes the results of an extensive review of the organizational and health care literature of advanced practice nursing (APN) roles, health care teams, and perceptions of team effectiveness. Teams have a long history in health care. Managers play an important role in mobilizing resources, guiding expectations of APN roles in teams and within organizations, and facilitating team process. Researchers have identified a number of advantages to the addition of APN roles in health care teams. The process within health care teams are dynamic and responsive to their surrounding environment. It appears that teams and perceptions of team effectiveness need to be understood in the broader context in which the teams are situated. Key team process are identified for team members to perceive their team as effective. The concepts of teamwork, perceptions of team effectiveness, and the introduction of APN roles in teams have been studied disparately. An exploration of the links between these concepts may further our understanding the health care team's perceptions of team effectiveness when APN roles are introduced. Such knowledge could contribute to the effective deployment of APN roles in health care teams and improve the delivery of health care services to patients and families.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available