3.9 Article

Open Innovation for Phenotypic Drug Discovery: The PD2 Assay Panel

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR SCREENING
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages 588-602

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1087057111405379

Keywords

open source; open innovation; PD2; phenotypic drug discovery; lead generation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phenotypic lead generation strategies seek to identify compounds that modulate complex, physiologically relevant systems, an approach that is complementary to traditional, target-directed strategies. Unlike gene-specific assays, phenotypic assays interrogate multiple molecular targets and signaling pathways in a target agnostic fashion, which may reveal novel functions for well-studied proteins and discover new pathways of therapeutic value. Significantly, existing compound libraries may not have sufficient chemical diversity to fully leverage a phenotypic strategy. To address this issue, Eli Lilly and Company launched the Phenotypic Drug Discovery Initiative (PD2), a model of open innovation whereby external research groups can submit compounds for testing in a panel of Lilly phenotypic assays. This communication describes the statistical validation, operations, and initial screening results from the first PD2 assay panel. Analysis of PD2 submissions indicates that chemical diversity from open source collaborations complements internal sources. Screening results for the first 4691 compounds submitted to PD2 have confirmed hit rates from 1.6% to 10%, with the majority of active compounds exhibiting acceptable potency and selectivity. Phenotypic lead generation strategies, in conjunction with novel chemical diversity obtained via open-source initiatives such as PD2, may provide a means to identify compounds that modulate biology by novel mechanisms and expand the innovation potential of drug discovery. (Journal of Biomolecular Screening 2011; 16: 588-602)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available