4.8 Article

Stabilizing Cu2S for Photovoltaics One Atomic Layer at a Time

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 5, Issue 20, Pages 10302-10309

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am403225e

Keywords

copper sulfide; Cu2S; atomic-layer deposition; thin-film solar cell; photovoltaic; barrier layers; surface passivation

Funding

  1. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) under EERE Solar Program
  2. Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU) under DOE [DE-AC05-06OR23100]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory by UChicago Argonne, LLC [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stabilizing Cu2S in its ideal stoichiometric form, chalcocite, is a long-standing challenge that must be met prior to its practical use in thin-film photovoltaic (PV) devices. Significant copper deficiency, which results in degenerate p-type doping, might be avoided by limiting Cu diffusion into a readily formed surface oxide and other adjacent layers. Here, we examine the extent to which PV-relevant metal-oxide over- and underlayers may stabilize Cu2S thin films with desirable semiconducting properties. After only 15 nm of TiO2 coating, Hall measurements and UV-vis-NIR spectroscopy reveal a significant suppression of free charge-carrier addition that depends strongly on the choice of deposition chemistry. Remarkably, the insertion of a single atomic layer of Al2O3 between Cu2S and TiO2 further stabilizes the active layer for at least 2 weeks, even under ambient conditions. The mechanism of this remarkable enhancement is explored by in situ microbalance and conductivity measurements. Finally, photoluminescence quenching measurements point to the potential utility of these nanolaminate stacks in solar-energy harvesting applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available